Get your product named in the answer
For founders and marketing leads at B2B SaaS companies. Rankli writes 30 product-led articles a month that name your product with its real features and its real price, publishes them to your CMS, and measures whether ChatGPT and Perplexity start citing you.
Cancel any day from the app. Unused articles refunded.
Your buyer decides on four kinds of search
Nobody signs up from a thought-leadership post. They sign up after reading the page that compared you to the tool they were about to buy. Those pages are the calendar.
Compare Rankli with the alternativesThe buyer has picked a category and is now picking a name. An article that names yours with the feature that fits that segment is the shortlist.
Someone already priced the incumbent and flinched. Your price and your onboarding are the reason they keep reading.
A comparison the buyer trusts is a comparison that states both prices. Ours reads them off your product profile and dates the competitor claim.
The job comes before the tool. The article that teaches the job is the article that gets to recommend one.
Four stages, and you approve the second one
You see the month of keywords before a word is written. Everything after that runs on its own.
Your product, read once
Rankli reads your site: what you sell, the features you name, the plans you price, the words your own pages use. That profile is what every later stage writes from.
Keywords with a stated reason
Research clusters the comparison, alternative and job-to-be-done queries by intent, and prints the reason each one is on the calendar before you schedule it.
Articles that name the product
1,500 to 3,000 words each, with your product placed where it answers the question, the feature named from the profile and the price taken from your own pricing page.
Published, then measured
Straight into your CMS as a draft or live, then tracked across 4 answer engines every month against a held-out control.
15 checks on every draft. Nine can stop it.
A SaaS blog is a sales asset. The rules that keep it one are enforced in code, on every article, before the post reaches your site.
- No invented specifics. A percentage with a source, an academic-style citation, a dated study, a quote attributed to a person: each is a hard failure, so a draft cannot pass on numbers nobody can find.
- Subject coverage. The draft has to cover your product and its category, not just the keyword. A hollow article is refused rather than scheduled.
- Length that ranks. 1,500 to 3,000 words, checked as a hard rule, with every section measured so nothing publishes as a heading over two sentences.
- Your banned phrases. The words your team never uses are a list you set, and a draft containing one does not publish.
- Keyword placement without stuffing. The target phrase in the title, the first hundred words and an H2, and a density ceiling above which it reads as spam.
- Internal links to your own pages. Contextual links into the pages you sell from, never into your terms page or your login screen.
9 of the 15 are hard: a draft that fails one does not reach your site. The rest are advisory and the verdict is written on the article, so an editor reads a scorecard rather than a wall of text.
Published where your product already lives
- 10 connections, including WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, Framer and your own webhook.
- Draft or live, set per connection. Start on draft, switch when the writing earns it.
- Credentials verified before anything is scheduled, so a permission problem surfaces on the connection screen rather than on publishing day.
- Images and meta description land with the post, and a retry updates the post that exists rather than creating a second one.
What you stop doing
- Turning a keyword export into briefs somebody has time to write.
- Chasing a freelancer for the draft that was due on Tuesday.
- Fact-checking a paragraph that cited a study with no link.
- Pasting HTML into a CMS and fixing the headings afterwards.
Every connection is documented step by step: WordPress, Webflow, Ghost and Framer.
Then we check whether the assistants started citing you
4 answer engines
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, asked the same tracked questions every month, 6 times each so a single lucky answer cannot move the reading.
A held-out control
Some of your tracked questions are deliberately left untouched by the calendar. Without them a rise in citations is a coincidence you cannot rule out.
The prediction goes first
The expected effect is written down before the articles publish, so the readout answers a question that was asked in advance.
240 tracked questions
On Growth, enough statistical power to resolve a change of about 4.6pp. The prompt count is the power, which is why it is priced like one.
What SaaS teams ask first
Will the articles actually mention our product, or write around it?
They name it. Rankli builds a product profile from your own site, and the substance check refuses a draft that covers the topic without covering the subject: it is one of the nine rules that can stop a publish. That is why a Rankli article reads like it came from your team rather than from a topic list.
Can it write comparison articles against our competitors?
Yes, and it writes them the way a buyer will check them: a claim about another product is phrased as what their pricing page lists, and the fabricated-specifics check refuses invented statistics, invented citations and invented quotes. A comparison nobody can catch out is a comparison sales can send.
How does it know our pricing and features?
From the profile it reads off your site, refreshed as your pages change. Nothing about your product is invented: a price that is not on your pricing page does not appear in an article. That is the difference between content you have to fact-check and content you can schedule.
What does AI-citation measurement actually give us?
A monthly reading of how often ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude name you, run as a pre-registered experiment with a held-out control and a prediction written down first. Growth tracks 240 questions and resolves a change of about 4.6pp. Rankli is the only product in this category that measures it as an experiment rather than a screenshot.
We already have a content writer. Where does Rankli fit?
It does the part that does not scale: research, drafting, 15 checks and publishing, 30 times a month. Set the connection to draft and your writer edits in your CMS instead of starting from an empty page.
What if the first month is not the writing we want?
Buy the $1 trial first: 3 finished articles on your own site, in your own voice, 14 days to read them. Nothing renews, and on a monthly plan you cancel any day from the app with the month's unused articles refunded.
Read three articles before you commit to thirty.
$1 once buys 3 finished articles, published live on your own site, in your own voice.
Cancel any day from the app. Unused articles refunded.